While women might prefer a male who earns more money than them, both men and women seek partners with similar incomes as them, contra stated preferences.
Only read the Marzoli et al. (2013) part since I saw it being quoted.
Telling people to allocate points to "wealth, dominance, intelligence, height, kindness, attractiveness" seems like a pretty bad method. These words can mean anything and everything. Maybe it says something about word use vibe preferences around talking about mate preference but it says nothing useful about mate preference.
Only read the Marzoli et al. (2013) part since I saw it being quoted.
Telling people to allocate points to "wealth, dominance, intelligence, height, kindness, attractiveness" seems like a pretty bad method. These words can mean anything and everything. Maybe it says something about word use vibe preferences around talking about mate preference but it says nothing useful about mate preference.